Today, (just in time for lent,) I've started an experiment in which I give up google reader and replace it with twitter. Ok, I don't usually celibrate/practice lent, but I thought this would be a good time to start this, (since I'm actually giving up something, LOL!) Basically, I created a 2nd twitter account, and followed as many of the sites I subscribe to in google reader, (or the ones that have a twitter account, anyway.) So far, when I find links I want to read, I'm sending them to
instapaper, which is an application that will save links for later. Because I don't really want to take all day reading each thing, I want to do it when I want to do it. Yep, I've probably missed some tweets with interesting links in them, but that's the consiquence of not having it all there, whenever I want it. Yep, google reader does update, but it will pretty much keep everything, when my twitter client pulls in new tweets, those are the tweets I read, (and go through, tweet-by-tweet.) If I want to read more tweets, well, that takes more time. So, yeah, I don't think I'll make it through the 40 days of lent, but that isn't really the objective of the experiment, the objective is to see if twitter works as well, (or better,) than google reader for rss. So many people say they're replacing google reader with twitter, so far, I'm wondering why.